Talk:Wang Fu/@comment-31881571-20181015005222

Shouldn’t Master Fu be Tibetan? We found/saw the book and the possible peacock miraculous arranged with a book on Tibet. It would make sense that Gabriel and Emilie, on a trip around Tibet, found two broaches and an old book around where the temple once was. In Tibet. Tibet is a part of China now but in 1845, when Master Fu should have been about 14 (I did some number rounding) the China-Tibet rule was debatable. The temple did seem to be rather isolated so it was probably fully Tibetan based on how long it had seemed to be around. I get that now he might be considered Chinese but when he was born and a kid he probably would have considered himself Tibetan.

I will say my research was not incredibly thorough but maybe just think about it.